Last week I was in Phoenix and Tucson visiting some of our customers and trying to help them solve their storage issues. A subset of our customers has instituted video monitoring of their premises for a variety of reasons. Many of these folks start by pointing their cameras data at their NetApp Filers as a simple way of storing data, but as the data collection increases over time they find that using Filers as a video vault is expensive.
Over the last few months we have been working with an increasing number of clients to help them implement our SimplStor hardware as an affordable video vault solution. SimplStor provides an affordable solution for video archiving, and easily scales up as customer storage requirements grow, and so our customers are migrating their secondary data from their Filers to SimplStor, this allows their Filers to serve up VM’s and databases and other priority jobs without forcing them to upgrade to the latest and most expensive NetApp equipment.
As the economy continues to muddle through with a moribund 2% growth rate IT departments need to find ways to handle their data storage requirements on a budget. Zerowait has the expertise and experience to help customers maintain their legacy NetApp equipment and also assist them in their data migrations of secondary storage to lower cost mass storage solutions like SimplStor.
In many organizations Storage is growing but budgets are not. How are you going to provide your organization’s growing storage requirements without breaking your budget with equipment from the big OEM’s? Zerowait has the answer.







One customer I met with is a Zerowait SimplStor user and a NetApp support customer of ours. We have been supporting their NetApp equipment for many years, and when they needed an archival solution they chose our SimplStor equipment. We spoke mostly about how to implement scalable storage solutions that will have a service cycle in excess of five years. This customer is tired of the three year forced upgrade cycles that the box selling manufacturers seem to always be pushing. In today’s tighter financial environment there is not budget for three year upgrade cycles. That is a message I have heard a lot over the last couple of years.
Last week I was in New York City visiting with customers who are trying to figure out how to affordably manage their vast and growing data archives. They have tried a variety of solutions from start ups and established vendors but nothing seems to solve the problems of data storage and management in a way that they need to. They use NetApp for their tier one storage and have a home built archival solution which is reliable and affordable, but not a great long term strategic storage solution.
This week I was visiting some of our North Carolina customers. Our customers have some pretty diverse business models, but one thing they all have in common is the desire to cut the costs of their operations to increase their profit margins. Only the government considers a slowdown in the rate of the increase in expenses to be a cut.
Last week I was in the DC area visiting with customers and I met with a company that is trying to build an affordable and scalable data infrastructure that can be collocated in N+1 data centers to provide fault tolerant delivery services. Using virtualization technology, global load balancing and NAS storage they are trying to build an adaptable infrastructure that offers several advantages over their competition.

